We have already talked about viruses, which are essentially genetic programmes which invade a host cell and then switch the host cell to reproduce a virus rather than itself – and in many cases this is the death of the host cell after some time. So from our knowledge of error rates and mutation rates and so on, we can draw two types of conclusion... well, in fact, we can draw three types of conclusion. We can study the evolution of viruses. We can see how did viruses come about. This question for instance in recent time was a very popular – how did the AIDS virus come about? Because it didn't appear in the Western World until 19... what was it?
[Q] '85.
... or '85. So the question is where did it come from? Did it evolve that quickly, or is it an old virus, or what is its origin? So we can use our insights to tackle such questions. The next question is how can we detect viruses, very precisely, very sensitively? Because if we wait until we are swamped with viruses it's usually too late to do anything, and the earlier we can recognise an infection by a virus the better, the more we can do against it... so diagnostics. And the third problem is can we develop anti-viral strategies... can we try to use our insight in the variability of viruses to develop potent methods against the virus?
[Q] So you mean you use weapons of the virus to kill the virus by its own weapons... or strategies?
For instance, that's one possibility, and, yes, usually pharma try to do such things... to interfere with something which is otherwise a natural thing.