So I think by creating this fashion or this fashionable science, I think the editors of these journals are doing disservice of science. They are misleading the general public what is and what is not important in research, and that has directly or indirectly an effect on how research is being funded and on many, many other factors. It's affecting how people are getting positions because some stupid administrators take as an indication of one's contribution how many times... how many papers a person has published in Nature or Science or Cell or in other journals.  It's totally irrelevant. It's important to know what a person had done... has done, and not where he has published it. Either it's an important work and then it can be published anywhere and an indication it was published in Science is not an indication that the paper is important. So it's a bad system and I just hope that in the near future the electronic publishing will take really over and that disposes of... actually of these journals that are run not by scientists but by journalists and that are after sensations rather than after actual progress in science. So maybe, hopefully that if electronic publishing allows probably rapid distribution of new work, then it will take over all this... and that this... I don't think that fashions in science will ever disappear, they have been now created and some of it will always exist, but some of the bad effects that it has now will be removed and science will return to its function of really looking for important results rather than for fashionable results.