Physicists are remarkably flexible, actually, as people. Physicists end up doing all kinds of things. People trained in physics show up in remarkable places. For example W Edwards Deming was trained as a physicist, he had a PhD in physics from Yale; then he became a New Deal statistician; then he was sent over to Japan at the end of the war to try to help rebuild Japanese industry, and he made all these wonderful suggestions about how to do that, he's a saint in Japan; and finally by the time he was 90 or so, he even acquired a reputation in his own country. He died at the age of 93 or something like that–just before my book came out. Remark… all sorts of people started as physicists, now whether the departments make these adjustments, the same adjustments as their members, that's another story, but some of them do, I think. I think physics departments have been rather generous about spawning other subjects within their bosoms. Bragg at Cambridge pretty much destroyed the old tradition of fundamental physics, but he built up solid-state physics and he built up radio astronomy and molecular biology, giving them an initial home in the physics lab, in the Cavendish. I think that was quite remarkable, even though I deplored what he did with elementary particle physics, I think he's greatly to be admired for hosting radio astronomy and molecular biology. So I think it's not improbable at all, various departments will… will adapt. But as to predicting the general course of science, I don't think… I don’t think I'd be very good at doing that.