I hated, if I get invited to a meeting, and first I say, 'Oh yes, that's an interesting subject'. And the next is, 'You have to provide an abstract and till then and then ... And you have to come with your manuscript', then already I say I can't go every month or every week to a meeting and then write a manuscript, otherwise I wouldn't do anything but writing manuscripts. This winter seminar doesn't require any written text. And the point we stimulate people to talk about work which is not yet finished, so which can be discussed still. In other words, people are uninhibited to talk things, because they are not pinned down, they can speculate in the seminar. And that makes it lively, that is the... And great people come now to the winter seminar. You don't have to take our thirtieth winter seminar where we had people like John Wheeler, Steven Weinberg and many... Roger Penrose, and many famous biologists.
Also many new ideas came out of the winter seminar. The first winter seminars we were concerned with macromolecular structures, with helix coil transitions, protein confirmation, allosterism, that all was discussed at the winter seminar. New ideas came there. Then enzyme kinetics, then the question of the origin of life and the evolution... evolutionary theory. These were ideas which were heavily discussed at those seminars, and many new papers came out of it. That continued with discussions of cell differentiation, of questions from embryology. It went on to the central nervous system. I remember several times David Ubell [sic] came and gave inspiring talks and we had theoreticians, Christopher Nomaltz [sic], Jack Cowan. And I think it was a meeting... I wouldn't know any example, it was unique, it was very unique... and the people who once participated were enthusiastic about it.