a story lives forever
Register
Sign in
Form submission failed!

Stay signed in

Recover your password?
Register
Form submission failed!

Web of Stories Ltd would like to keep you informed about our products and services.

Please tick here if you would like us to keep you informed about our products and services.

I have read and accepted the Terms & Conditions.

Please note: Your email and any private information provided at registration will not be passed on to other individuals or organisations without your specific approval.

Video URL

You must be registered to use this feature. Sign in or register.

NEXT STORY

Missing out on a great discovery

RELATED STORIES

Who understood genetic theory?
John Maynard Smith Scientist
Comments (0) Please sign in or register to add comments

[Q] [RA] Fisher, at the beginning of the Genetical Theory [of Natural Selection], discusses how Darwin was closer to it than one might have thought. He was definitely on to the idea that sex was inherited in an all or none way, so he... he probably wouldn't have needed much prompting from Mendel.

No. Curiously enough, his cousin, Francis Galton, was awful close too, and clearly Weismann was very close. Weismann almost reinvented Mendel's Laws a priori, actually, if only he'd been prepared to believe the world was a bit simpler than he did, he'd have got Mendel's Laws a priori with no experiments at all - but he didn't quite.

[Q] Fisher thought they ought to have been invented a priori.

Well, they very nearly were. Weismann gets the whole thing, he says... he talks about Ids, not genes, he gets the whole thing, except that he cannot believe the world is so simple that there's just one copy of each gene in the gamete and two in the zygote. And he does it, I can't remember, for a hexadecaploid, something with 16 copies of every gene. And, of course, the thing becomes horrendously complicated. If only he'd said, the simple way is to have one copy each, he'd have got Mendel's Laws. Sad, really. But I think, obviously, the fact that Haldane understood something and taught his student, doesn't mean to say that everybody at that time did. But I didn't see any signs of incomprehension. I mean, there were people around who were in the old morphological trap who didn't actually see this was interesting. You know, that's always the way. And there were fights about grants and editorships and all that sort of... the sociological stuff, but there was no intellectual difficulty.

The late British biologist John Maynard Smith (1920-2004) is famous for applying game theory to the study of natural selection. At Eton College, inspired by the work of old Etonian JBS Haldane, Maynard Smith developed an interest in Darwinian evolutionary theory and mathematics. Then he entered University College London (UCL) to study fruit fly genetics under Haldane. In 1973 Maynard Smith formalised a central concept in game theory called the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS). His ideas, presented in books such as 'Evolution and the Theory of Games', were enormously influential and led to a more rigorous scientific analysis and understanding of interactions between living things.

Listeners: Richard Dawkins

Richard Dawkins was educated at Oxford University and has taught zoology at the universities of California and Oxford. He is a fellow of New College, Oxford and the Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University. Dawkins is one of the leading thinkers in modern evolutionary biology. He is also one of the best read and most popular writers on the subject: his books about evolution and science include "The Selfish Gene", "The Extended Phenotype", "The Blind Watchmaker", "River Out of Eden", "Climbing Mount Improbable", and most recently, "Unweaving the Rainbow".

Tags: RA Fisher, Charles Darwin, Gregor Mendel, Francis Galton, Charles Weismann

Duration: 1 minute, 45 seconds

Date story recorded: April 1997

Date story went live: 24 January 2008