I certainly know at… for my own, since I believe I was… I was the first to have the curtain drawn, at least that's how it seemed to me. That for me, I… suddenly the curtain got opened and I could see it all. And certainly I don't think I would have been led to think about that funny connection; you see, the thing is this: you talk about phage T4, you get all involved in the intricacies of this, and if you talk about two things simultaneously, so, you know, you have a lot of green balls bouncing and you have a lot of red balls bouncing, then sometimes you can just see one set of balls bouncing the same way. And I think that is so necessary to continue, you know, almost hysterical conversation, just constitutive talking, because I think that brings things together that you don't actually see by… logical deduction, because most logical deduction you just go around in the same circle and you need to break out of it. So at least for me, bringing this together… and I know that I'd had concerns about this, but I couldn't formulate it and I couldn't see what this was. And, you know, one just didn't understand… put that all together at the time. And at the moment one saw there was this intermediate… now, one of the unfortunate things, I should say, was that messenger got defined as being unstable. Now, it happens to be unstable in bacteria. But of course this was used as a great argumentative point, then when people later on found there was a whole lot of RNA in eukaryotic cells which was unstable but wasn't messenger. I mean, we now know what this is all about; it was the hnRNA. But instability was never the criterion. Instability was required to explain induction. And to explain how fast you could turn off induction. There was no memory for induction, so you had to say you get the message and you use it up. But it was not necessary. The necessary concept is that you add something to a machine which use… which gets instructed by it. It is effectively all these old ideas, you know, of the Turing machine, the von Neumann machine, to actually be able to say this is tape. And of course, what you do then is you use the analogies that come from everyday life, you know, and there were tape recorders just making their appearance then and you said, well, you know, you put the tape in the machine, the tape reads it, we had teletype printers which used tape. So I think it's that, and an analogical thinking which gives you… which gives you this. Of course, I… I was… I had an unfortunate thing at the Cold Spring Harbor symposium. I said, 'We call this messenger RNA', and I said, 'Well, you know, because messenger… Mercury was the messenger of the gods'. And Chargaff very quickly stood up in the audience and said, 'Yes, I wish to point out that Mercury may have been the messenger of the gods, but he was also the god of the thieves', you see, which said a lot for… which said a lot for… for Chargaff at the time. But it's a very witty remark. But I don't think we stole anything from anybody there, except from nature. I think it's right to steal from nature.