Superstring theory seems to have the right properties to be the long-desired unified quantum field theory of all the particles and all the forces. Of course it's not a theory of everything because to describe reality you need not only the theory of the particles and forces; you also need the initial condition of the universe near the beginning of its expansion.  And also the results of an unimaginably long sequence of chance events that also determine the history of the universe… co-determine the history of the universe along with the… along with the two fundamental laws. Hopefully we can discuss that… later. Surely. But… but as the fundamental theory of the particles and forces it seems quite a… it is the only candidate and it seems very promising. Recent developments in theory have removed some of the apparent ugliness that was there because there were several forms of superstring theory: type 2A, type 2B and different groups and so on and so forth. But it seems plausible now, as a result of the duality demonstrations… the recent demonstrations of duality,  it seems plausible that all the different theories, as they were called, are just different phases of a single theory. And the many solutions that people seem to have found, at least approximate solutions, if they are genuinely exact solutions, they would also most likely be different phases. So there's really just a single theory, and it would be the only manifestation of the bootstrap idea. Well that's very beautiful, and the bootstrap idea of course can be explained very easily in words, which is something that many people wanted as a characteristic of the... of the unified theory. The… the fact that in the suitable approximation it predicts Einstein's general relativistic theory of gravitation, it incorporates it into quantum mechanics without encountering any infinities, is wonderful. So I'm very strongly in favor of the possibility that it might be the right fundamental theory, or at least would develop into the right one. We've seen with these latest researches and the change of name from superstring theory to M-theory, that one can discover more properties in the theory and it then assumes a somewhat different shape from what one had previously assumed, but it should be… should be regarded still as the same theory. It seems to have other sectors: the latest fashion, they say, is to describe the so-called base space as a one-dimensional space with just the tau variable, not sigma and tau, then in that base space one can have supersymmetry all the way up to M = 16. And that would be the chosen one, the maximum… maximum number of supersymmetries that one can have with one base space dimension. It all sounds very exciting to me. Of course, I'm not following it in detail; I'm following it like a reporter.