I have this running argument with Godard and some of the film-makers who is his buddies, that's why I put some in my film, a little title: 'This is political film'. Because, you know, they look at it as: Godard has made some very nasty statements about the avant-garde. I mean, he liked, you know... he wrote very nice review about Hallelujah the Hills and where this little political, naive political film that we made with Adolfas on Vietnam... He praised that very much, but the rest to him, like my films are... like my last film, of course, there is nothing about contemporary, you know, it's problems, nothing, it's a totally useless kind of film, politically. But you see, I put that in because my... what is politics? They were... to me politics is... is reflected in the way and style of life and thinking and being what one is and it's that attracts then everything around and changes the whole society. So then I say, 'Who are really the people that have changed?' I mean, there have been people and movements and parties and systems that made this 20th century into the most horrible century that we had. So we go to all the politically, political parties, to all and those who supported those parties to the very end. You know, I went to there, I lived on there, you know, under the Soviets and under the Germans so I... I could ask myself who has contributed to the positive change and those were all negative affects. Those aren't humanity, and R Buckminster Fuller. Who else? John Cage, Fluxus, some of the scientists, some of the poets, so that's something else. Those are... now to me, those are the right... there are politics, there are many different politics so there are some right politics for me, some are positive, some are negative, depends how they affect and change humanity and life. So I am totally against Godard politics, and when I put that title in it's my conversation with Godard. More or less that is how I look at it.

[Q] Of course, Godard is the person who's come closer to your position than...

Now?

[Q] Now.

Not in these last... okay, maybe he has cut back since his last film, okay that's not what I want to talk about it. It's so stupid and you see, he's very clever, that I have to admit. To hide the stupidity of his talking about in... in whatever the title of his last film, I wiped it out already of my head, he has cut it to little pieces, abstracted so that when something, some stupid statement is cut to pieces abstracted there, it sounds okay, you see. But when you put it together you begin to think and put it together again, it's naive, it's naive and stupid and simple-minded. He's talked there about the French Resistance and the whole thing is stupid. No, I don't think he has... he has left that, you know, active kind of Marxist or whatever position, but now he has... I think, maybe his brain has melted, he's now totally in... descended into the... totally nit-witty, stupid. You have to tell...

[Q] I'm not going to get...

But I liked his... Pravda is one of the films of Godard that I really like, Pravda. That reflections on the... of all that period, well, he... does not speak. There is no talking, where he be open his mouth, you know, I had to close my ears, it... it's whatever he says so pretentious and stupid simple-minded all those philosophies. In Pravda, it's only noise, noise, great sound, one of the great sound films and it's not available, you cannot find it anywhere. I wish he wouldn't talk in his films. I will somehow send a message to him: please, in the next film don't talk.