a story lives forever
Register
Sign in
Form submission failed!

Stay signed in

Recover your password?
Register
Form submission failed!

Web of Stories Ltd would like to keep you informed about our products and services.

Please tick here if you would like us to keep you informed about our products and services.

I have read and accepted the Terms & Conditions.

Please note: Your email and any private information provided at registration will not be passed on to other individuals or organisations without your specific approval.

Video URL

You must be registered to use this feature. Sign in or register.

NEXT STORY

WD Hamilton: inclusive fitness

RELATED STORIES

Hamilton: political and ideological commitment
John Maynard Smith Scientist
Comments (0) Please sign in or register to add comments

Why is it that Hamilton, having had the sort of central notion, really ran with it, really made it an important part of our biological understanding. Whereas Haldane had the notion and did nothing with it, I understood the notion and did nothing with it. And I do think, I have to put it down, to some extent, to political and ideological commitment. Hamilton had the advantage over us, in a sense... a) that he was passionately interested in social insects and knew something about them and wanted to explain them. He saw them as a problem to be explained. And he had, clearly, no reluctance in his mind about the idea that notions about the evolution of altruism in social insects, might possibly have a relevance to humans. Neither Haldane nor I knew anything much about social insects at that time, though Haldane did become interested in them later. But more importantly, we, at that time, and we're now talking about '56, '57, I suppose when we were discussing this idea, if you look at it in the context of where Haldane publishes it, in an article in New Biology, it's very much in the context of trying to understand human behaviour and human altruism, and people going out and winning the VC or joining monasteries or what you will. And neither he nor I at that stage were at all willing to entertain the notion that such behaviour would be anything other than culturally determined and influenced. We were, I think, very reluctant, as Marxists would be, to admit that anything genetic might influence human behaviour. And I think that we didn't say consciously to ourselves that this would be un-Marxist so we won't do it, that's not the way that the mind works; but I think it was a path that our minds were not, so to speak, prepared to go down, in a quite almost unconscious sense, whereas Bill was very prepared to go down it. And he also had the natural history background and knowledge to enable him to go down it, which we both lacked. And so what I'm really try to say is that to make big breaks in science, which Hamilton did, it's not enough to have the technical understanding of some technical point, you've got to have the - it's got to fit in with your world view that you should pursue this road, and I don't think it did for Haldane and myself at that time. It would have done later.

The late British biologist John Maynard Smith (1920-2004) is famous for applying game theory to the study of natural selection. At Eton College, inspired by the work of old Etonian JBS Haldane, Maynard Smith developed an interest in Darwinian evolutionary theory and mathematics. Then he entered University College London (UCL) to study fruit fly genetics under Haldane. In 1973 Maynard Smith formalised a central concept in game theory called the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS). His ideas, presented in books such as 'Evolution and the Theory of Games', were enormously influential and led to a more rigorous scientific analysis and understanding of interactions between living things.

Listeners: Richard Dawkins

Richard Dawkins was educated at Oxford University and has taught zoology at the universities of California and Oxford. He is a fellow of New College, Oxford and the Charles Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University. Dawkins is one of the leading thinkers in modern evolutionary biology. He is also one of the best read and most popular writers on the subject: his books about evolution and science include "The Selfish Gene", "The Extended Phenotype", "The Blind Watchmaker", "River Out of Eden", "Climbing Mount Improbable", and most recently, "Unweaving the Rainbow".

Tags: Nature New Biology, inclusive fitness, WD Hamilton, JBS Haldane

Duration: 2 minutes, 43 seconds

Date story recorded: April 1997

Date story went live: 24 January 2008