When Donaldson had his… produced his invariants from the Yang–Mills equations, the physicists who thought about these things, in particular Witten, I think were very mystified as to… here was he taking these equations which they were using for quantum field theory, he was doing some marvellous things with them mathematically, and what the hell was it… was going on? And it really was very... very unclear for them, and Witten struggled a long time with that objective, trying to understand what Donaldson theory was with all the results in front of him.
And even so, you know, it took him a long, long time to realise and the... the obstacles were… there were a couple of obstacles. One was that when he finally put the thing together that the... the spin-statistics theorem broke down in the Donaldson theory. I mean, things had the wrong… the fermions and bosons had the wrong statistics. So he had to break the psychological barrier that you... you… that physicists had always been brought up to do, that you have to associate the right kind of spin with the right kind of particles… and he had to twist it round.
And so once he, you know, was prepared to break that kind of psychological barrier, then he twisted the theories so that they interchanged the spins. Then he realised that Donaldson theory was a quantum field theory in this sense. It didn't matter for this purpose that he'd twisted the theory because it was a different purpose and so on. So there was a... there was a significant barrier he had to overcome against all, you know, the training of physicists to make that. And... and then, having done that, to observe that the theory was a topological theory and everything worked well.
So I think, given the fact that he had all the data and yet it took him a big effort to actually… even staring at it, to… I... I think there's... there’s no chance that the physicists would have actually produced that if... if Donaldson’s theory hadn't been there in front of them. It wouldn't have occurred to them and it was, as I say, upside down. And, no I... I think it was definitely a question of looking hard at the mathematics and trying to see how it fitted in, and then forcing it to fit in against all the preconceptions. And I say, he spent… I spent a visiting term at the institute then, and it was more or less the last day I was there, having talked with Witten most of the term. You know, he... he… I think at a dinner party he told me, you know, he'd just discovered how to see this and he was terribly excited, and I was just going away and, you know, it was a big breakthrough; but it took him a long time.