Life in physics in those days was as it is today, one of trying to understand something, showing over to other people to help clarify it, writing up the results and getting the thing published, although it doesn't have the speed of e-mail of today. But I certainly sympathized with the editors of journals and their problems of dealing with the great masses of material that came in, getting it refereed and simplified to the point where it would act to the credit of the journal. John Tate, of the University of Minnesota, was a great conscience of American physics, and a lot of the credit for the prestige of The Physical Review, the American journal of physics, goes to him, his care in getting papers reviewed by proper reviewers. But one time, that policy came into trouble. Einstein sent in a paper and Tate wrote back saying- appreciate it, we're sending it as a standard practice for a referee to be reviewed. And Einstein wrote back, he didn't want the paper refereed, he wanted it published. And he withdrew the paper and he published it in a different journal, the journal of the Franklin Institute. It's a great thing to have in this world of science, this referee mechanism to sort out errors and mushy thinking and erroneous reasoning, and get credits right.